STRATHAM PLANNING BOARD
PUBLIC MEETING MINUTES
Agenda: The
Town of Stratham, Planning Board conducted a Public Hearing on
Approval of Minutes:
New Business - Preliminary
Consultation:
Tax Map 1 Lots 1 & 2, Saint Michael Parish
Proposed Church,
Map 5
Continued Public
Hearing:
Map 18 Lots 8, 9-3, 12, 13-1 for
Scott Cornell, CC Property Group, LLC of
Map 18 Lots
9-3, 13-1 for Scott Cornell, CC Property Group, LLC of 61 Union Road for Single
Family Open Space Cluster Subdivision – Approval of Yield Plan for a 8 lot
traditional subdivision or a 11 lot open space cluster subdivision.
Other:
Planning Work Session – Subdivision & Site Plan Review Regulations
Members Present: Chair Janet Johnson, Jeffrey Hyland, Gordon Barker, Martin Wool, Bruno Federico, and Town Planner, Charles (Chuck) Grassie.
Ms. Johnson welcomed Gordon Barker as a new voting
member. Ms. Johnson asked Mr. Hyland to
act as a voting member tonight. She
noted that the minutes from
Tax Map 1 Lots 1 & 2, Saint Michael Parish Proposed
Church,
Mr. Federico informed the Board that he was a member of
St. Michael’s Church, and said he would step down if the Board so wished
it. There were no objections to Mr.
Federico remaining on the Board. Pastor
Marc Drouin was present representing St. Michael’s Church. Daniel Blais from TF Moran, Inc., and Amanda
Barker from NH Soil Consultants were also present. They had submitted a design proposal for
their site at the end of
Ms. Barker stated that NH Soil Consultants completed the
wetlands delineation on the property, delineated the edge of surface waters,
completed the HISS mapping, identified the limit of tidal influence, and did a
wetlands functions and values assessment.
She pointed out the key water resource areas on the property. She indicated that they had compiled a list
of all the environmental setbacks for both Stratham and
Mr. Barker stated that the applicant came before the Conservation Commission and gave a presentation on their proposed plan. Some of the Commission’s suggestions have been incorporated into this proposed plan. He asked about drainage from the parking lot and snow storage. He was told they have been working on that issue. They hope to use mostly sheet flow for drainage. They haven’t decided where they will store the snow. Mr. Hyland asked about daily traffic flow. He was told that the project description that was submitted had that information. Rev. Drouin stated that they do not plan on renting out the hall. It would only be used for parish ministry. There was a discussion on this issue. Mr. Federico asked if they had any plans for further expansion. Rev. Drouin said not at this time. There were additional discussions on seating capacity; parking; sewer and water; traffic; the size of the rectory; the amount of affected wetlands; and making sure the prayer paths don’t affect the wetlands areas. They will be doing a traffic study. Lucy Cushman, from the audience, strongly suggested that they leave as many trees as possible. Mr. Blais stated that they have no control over the trees in the power line easement. They will try to maintain a green buffer where they can. They will be providing a view shed so that people can see the church.
Map 5
A representative from Appledore Engineering was present to represent the applicant. He said they hope to move into the site that was before the Planning Board last year for a day care center. They hope to use the existing building as is. He gave a brief description of the property The Center would do some modifications to the driveway entrance to allow for two way traffic; add additional parking in front; and provide circulation in front of the building. He noted that the current school has an enrollment of 24 students, but they expect to double the occupancy. Presently the teacher/student ratio is 1 to 1. He asked for input from the Board on any problems or concerns with the previous day care plan, as the applicant moves forward with this project.
Mr. Barker informed the applicant that the NHDOT is
planning on putting in a center turn lane from
Map 18 Lots 9-3, 13-1 for Scott
Cornell, CC Property Group, LLC of
Ms. Johnson announced the Mr. Barker would not act as a voting member for this application because it is his first night on the Board. Mr. Hyland would act as a voting member for this application tonight. Ms. Johnson stated that the discussions tonight would stick to only those topics Mr. Grassie indicates. Mr. Grassie had distributed copies of his Planner’s memo (see file) with the steps for approval listed on it. He stated that tonight’s discussion would be on Step 2 – Preliminary Development Plan. He read the sections of Step 2. He said that the Board would be approving the maximum number of units that can be developed; discussing possible waivers; and deciding if the applicant can move on to Step 3 – Final Application. He stated that in Step 3 they submit all the engineering, and all of the data on the site like a typical subdivision. If the Board decides that the cluster is not appropriate for the site, they deny the Conditional Use Permit and the applicant can reapply with a standard subdivision.
David Emanuel from Emanuel Engineering was present to represent the applicants. Attorney Thomas Keane was also present to represent the applicants. Mr. Cornell submitted some revised land use calculations. Mr. Emanuel indicated that they had addressed several items the Board had concerns about from the last meeting. They eliminated cluster lots 2 and 3, which leaves eight new lots and the existing Cornell lot. Mr. Emanuel went over the revised Land Use Summary. There were discussions regarding: the possible connector road to the Charbonneau property at the end of the hammerhead; suggestions on house sizes due to lot size constraints; the proposed buffer from the rear property lines; designing for minimum runoff; having a circle instead of a hammerhead at the end of the road; the wetlands crossings; and the bonus calculations. Mr. Wool commented that he now likes the cluster plan with the two houses removed from it. Mr. Barker asked if the Conservation Commission saw the soils plans. He noted that there is a double driveway going through a large wetland area. There was further discussion on this issue. Lissa Ham, from the audience, asked the Board to go through the checklist, line by line, for the bonuses. Mr. Grassie went over the checklist. There was a discussion regarding the various bonuses. Bob Goodrich, from the audience, suggested that that Board make it a condition for this and any future approvals that no water will be diverted intentionally or accidentally onto anyone else’s property. Mr. Grassie said the applicant is going to try to do ground water re-integration on the site, and maintain as much of the water on the site as possible. There was a discussion on some ways that could be accomplished. The Board granted a bonus total of 2 units; 1 for doing a cluster subdivision, and 1.05 for innovative layout and design. Mr. Federico made a motion to approve a cluster site plan with 9 units, including the applicants present home. Mr. Hyland seconded the motion, which passed unanimously. Mr. Emanuel asked the Board’s opinion on the waiver request regarding road center radii and making sharper corners to help slow down traffic. Mr. Grassie explained the request in detail. Members of the audience spoke in favor of slowing down the traffic. Mr. Wool made a motion to continue the application to June 7, 2006. Mr. Federico seconded the motion, which passed with a vote of three in favor. Mr. Barker abstained because he was not present for previous meetings on this application.
Map 18 Lots 8, 9-3, 12, 13-1 for Scott Cornell, CC Property
Group, LLC of 61 Union Road and David Moriaty of Winnicutt Road for a Lot Line
Relocation and Consolidation:
Lot Line Relocation and Consolidation was also continued to June 7, 2006.
Other:
Planning Work Session –
Subdivision & Site Plan Review Regulations:
Mr. Grassie noted that he had distributed copies of a draft Lot Configuration & Driveway Regulation Section 4.4.1 and 4.4.6. He said he had looked at a number of ordinances around the state to come up with this draft. He read the draft ordinance aloud and explained various sections in detail. There were discussions on various sections. The Board members will review the draft ordinances for discussion at the next meeting.
Mr. Grassie informed the Board members of a public hearing scheduled for Thursday, April 27, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. in the Stratham Municipal Center on the widening of Route 108. He had distributed copies of a pamphlet entitled “Getting the Most out of Public Hearings: Ideas to Improve Public Involvement”. Mr. Barker had attended a meeting in Lee, NH regarding the reconstruction of Route 33, and gave a brief outline of what he learned at that meeting. The State is going to put in a turning lane along Route 33 from Squamscott Road to the Technical College. There was a brief discussion on those plans. Mr. Barker suggested requiring the type of soils on abutting properties at the end of paper streets be put on all plans. This way you know that the paper street can be connected in the future.
Mr. Federico made a motion to adjourn at 8:58 p.m. Mr. Barker seconded the motion, which carried.
Respectfully submitted,
Linda A. Beaudoin
Secretary Stratham Planning Board